Osocio NL

Brain on Board — a different way to look at safer driving

Posted by Tom Megginson | 31-01-2013 00:05 | Category: Road safety



Traffic Injury Research Foundation Brain on Board

This is my own work (and that of my colleagues at Acart Communications) so I’m not reviewing it here so much as sharing.

Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF), Toyota Foundation and Acart partnered to launch a safer driving initiative that teaches Canadians how to use their vehicles’ advanced safety features more effectively. This is a reaction to research that shows some features are leading to overconfident — rather than safer — driving.

To get attention and engage audiences with out-of-home posters, we created visual puzzles that are a mix of rebus images and words. The objective is to draw the viewer’s curiosity, then engage them in using their own brains to decipher the headline. This is a mnemonic reminder that some things (like driving) need to be approached more thoughtfully.

The posters drive traffic to a campaign web site, brainonboard.ca, which is packed with TIRF’s research findings broken down for the public, with relevant information, statistics, and safer driving advice. The campaign is also social on Twitter and Facebook.


Traffic Injury Research Foundation Brain on Board

TIRF were the lead on this project, and they’re an interesting partner to have as they base all their communications on their ongoing research on influencing driver behaviour. We previously worked with them on an impaired driving campaign that focussed on reinforcing positive statements against drunk driving by people of all ages. It was a partnership with the Brewers Association of Canada, Arrive Alive and Student Life.

TIRF and the partners also give us the opportunity to try different creative approaches to get attention. The Brain on Board campaign, for example, we purposely threw out the conventions of readability and instant comprehension in the hope that we can open up a conversation about an aspect of safer driving that is urgent, but not yet well-understood.


Advertiser:
Traffic Injury Research Foundation/Toyota Foundation/Acart Communications
Agency:
Acart Communications (own work)
Additional credits:
Creative Director/Copywriter: Tom Megginson
Associate Creative Director: Vernon Lai
Senior Creative Director: John Staresinic
Art Director: Kerry Hodgson
Designers: Leslie Stewart & Sophie Jalbert
Digital Media Manager: Stacey Van Buskirk
V.P.Client Services: John Westbrook
Account Manager: Amanda van de Ven
Account Executive: Laurence de Montigny St-Onge
Production Manager: Lynn Norris
Source:
Change Marketing




Comments


Comments about Brain on Board — a different way to look at safer driving

Problem with puzzle type advertising is that if people want puzzles they search for them in particular magazines/journals, on particular pages, but if they see something like this they just turn a page or go away even if what these posters say is true. Puzzle advertising are for people who live in advertising, but not for anybody else.

Posted by pR | 31-01-2013 08:20

Comments about Brain on Board — a different way to look at safer driving

No, the problem is that some people’s brains are ‘closed’ by default, like the previous poster’s.  These ads are birlliant and help drive the point home (no pun intended, but recognized) that goes with the message that is being conveyed.  In this case the message is the meaning and the meanin is the message.  These messages draw the viewer in and I would think most people’s brains couldn’t resist the challenge - by and large we like to be informed, and we want to know what something says, even if it means expending some synaptic function to do so.  Obviously some people won’t expend the effort, the way some won’t put in the effort to pour mikl on their cereal before eating it, but I would think they would be in the monority.  The ironic part about this is that Toyota, the company with the most extensive and invasive technology that does more things that drivers *should* be doing, across their whole line, than any other manufacturer.  ‘STAR’ is not star in my book, the more cars do for people the less they will use their brains while operating them.

Posted by Prtoo | 31-01-2013 22:30



My comment



Comment:




Your comment will not be visible until a moderator approves it.








Some rights reserved 2005-2013 Osocio/Houtlust.
Disclaimer. Terms of use. Privacy statement.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.







Support us

Do you like our blog? Support us with a donation.
We're non-commercial. We all make Osocio pro bono in our spare time and we can use some support.





image of a graduation cap

Recent in Academy


Branding a time-bound campaign, Forest & Bird did it.

It’s not new but it is not often used: branding for a time-bound campaign. The kind of branding used for temporary purpose. Forest & Bird did it recently for their Love Nature: Vote 2014 campaign. New Zealand’s largest independent conservation organisation wanted nature back on the political agenda. The future…
Read more

Can fundraising marketers recreate the #icebucketchallenge?

Yesterday, it finally happened. Somebody challenged me to the Ice Bucket Challenge for ALS. If your internet connection has been broken all summer, it’s this year’s big meme. You can read about it here. To be honest, I felt that the movement had passed its high-water mark when I saw…
Read more


About Osocio

Osocio is dedicated to social advertising and non-profit campaigns. It’s the place where marketing and activism collide. Formerly known as the Houtlust Blog, Osocio is the central online hub for advertisers, ad agencies, grassroots, activists, social entrepreneurs, and good Samaritans from around the globe.
Read more

(the about page is also available in Bahasa Indonesia, Chinese 汉语/漢語, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, Nihongo 日本語, Ivrit עברית, Filipino, Polski, Português, Russian Русский язык, Slovenčina, Suomi, Svenska and Türkçe)